Grubea v. Rosicki $FNMA #FANNIEGATE
In an decision released last week in a lawsuit unrelated to the Net Worth Sweep, Judge Rakoff says (at p. 53 of the slip opinion attached to this e-mail message) that the $87 billion excess the GSEs returned to Treasury in connection with the PSPAs "does not represent a profit, as none of the Treasury's principal investment has been repaid. Rather the dividends that Treasury has received are equivalent to interest payments owed to the taxpayers for putting their capital at risk."12-cv-07199-0180
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.