$FNma #FANNIEGATE
The Collins Plaintiffs, in a letter dated yesterday that's attached to this e-mail message, that it should pay attention to last week's decisions in Lucia v. SEC amd CFBP v. RD Legal rejecting action by tribunals like FHFA that aren't constitutionally structured. 17-20364-00514527588
The Bhatti Plaintiffs delivered copies of last week's decisions in Lucia v. SEC and CFPB v. RD Legal to Judge Schiltz yesterday, saying they are "relevant to both the merits of Plaintiffs' claim that FHFA is unconstitutionally structured and whether Mr. DeMarco's status as an Acting Director changes the analysis for purposes of that claim." A copy of the filing is attached to this e-mail message. 17-cv-02185-0069
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.