$Fnma #Fanniegate
Fairholme, Arrowood and the Class Plaintiffs tell Judge Lamberth there's no reason to reconsider his Sept. 28, opinion because FHFA is advancing "a misguided attempt to rehash old arguments and relitigate issues that th[e] Court has completely and correctly decided." Importantly, the shareholder-plaintiffs tell Judge Lamberth, FHFA hasn't brought anything new before the court; FHFA repeats what it's already argued without success. The shareholder-plaintiffs urge Judge Lamberth to reject FHFA's " last-ditch attempt to relitigate a theory that this Court already considered and rejected." A copy of today's filing is attached to this e-mail message.13-mc-01288-0091
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.