$FNMA #FANNIEGATE shoutout to how much lamberth sucks
The Saxton Plaintiffs filed their Response with the JPMDL this afternoon, and a copy is attached to this e-mail message. The Saxton Plaintiffs oppose FHFA's transfer and consolidation request because (i) the facts in their case differ from the cases Judge Lamberth dismissed and (ii) they don't believe Judge Lamberth would give their lawsuit fair consideration. The Saxton Plaintiffs support Ms. Robinson's selection of the Eastern District of Kentucky as a transferee district rather than the Districts of Columbia or Delaware, observing that Judge Thapur in Kentucky is far more expeditious than Judge Lamberth in D.C. resolving cases on his docket. The Saxton Plaintiffs echo Ms. Robinson's advice not to consolidate their cases with the Delaware and Virginia cases because those shareholders' cases are rooted in state law.MDL 2713-0019
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.