$fnma #fanniegate peter chapman notes
Get ready to be confused.
The Government filed a Reply (Doc. 291) today, under seal, in Fairholme v. U.S. The docket entry says it's a Reply to a Response (Doc. 286) filed under seal by Fairholme to the Government's mysterious Motion (Doc. 285) for expedited relief for something it wanted that was filed under seal. We thought that Judge Sweeney's Order (Doc. 287) dated Jan. 26, 2016, also filed under seal, brought an end to whatever dispute was articulated in Docs. 285 and 286.
Apparently not. There's something swirling in the ether related to Doc. 285 that's still under wraps and wasn't completely resolved when the parties filed their Joint Status Report (Doc. 288) on Jan, 28, 2016
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.