$FNMA #FANNIEGATE OMG READ THIS
16-cv-21221-0020The Edwards Plaintiffs delivered their Response to Judge Scola today opposing FHFA's renewed substitution motion. The Edwards Plaintiffs argue tht (i) their claims are direct claims against Deloitte, (ii) FHFA has a debilitating conflict of interest, and (iii) shareholders suing Deloitte doesn't restrain or affect FHFA fs exercise of powers or functions as conservator. A copy of the Response is attached to this e-mail message.
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.