$FNMA #FANNIEGATE OBIT analyis
Watt's statements of fact and opinion may be used fruitfully towards the substantive merit of claims made in the cases.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120649102
Even so, much ado is being made of one of the battles fought in the Jacob/Hindes case (and others facing issues of standing). That battle is waged to overcome the invoking of HERA's statutes that give nearly complete power over the GSEs to FHFA (4617(b)(2)(A)) and that bar derivative suits on behalf of the GSEs via the anti-injunction clause (4617(f)).
This is being done in the Plaintiffs briefs by clearly demonstrating FHFA's manifest conflicts of interest, an exception with legal precedents that loosens the bindings of that statute (4617(f)) prohibiting derivative suits.
See: http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Jacobs_Hindes/15-00708-0023.pdf see pages 50-53 and notes for those pages.
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.



