$Fnma #FAnniegate
In a letter dated yesterday, a copy of which is attached to this e-mail message, Messrs. Jacobs and Hindes tell the Third Circuit Judge Lamberth is confused about the applicability of Delaware and Virginia corporate law to the GSEs. Fannie and Freddie's charters specify the terms and conditions for issuing preferred stock (e.g., consideration, conditions precedent, vesting) and declarations of discretionary dividends, but applicable state law dictate the rights, powers, and preferences of the preferred stock itself, including mandatory dividends. And, Messrs. Jacobs and Hindes add, of course Judge Lamberth couldn't find any case law on this issue; "There is no directly analogous case because the Net Worth Sweep is an absurdity without precedent," they say. 17-3794-0032
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.