$fnma #fanniegate
The Bhatti Plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgment and response to FHFA and Treasury's motions to dismiss today, and copies of those documents are attached to this e-mail message. A collection of 21 exhibits attached to Doc. 46 is posted at http://bankrupt.com/misc/17-cv-02185-0046-Exhibits.pdf because of its size. The Bhatti Plaintiffs continue their constitutional attack on FHFA's structure, say FHFA is not immune from those constitutional claims (and HERA's succession clause couldn't include those claims), and tell Judge Schlitz that the Perry and Saxton cases never touched on these claims and they have no preclusive effect. 17-cv-02185-0045 17-cv-02185-0046 17-cv-02185-0041 17-cv-02185-0043 17-cv-02185-0042 17-cv-02185-0044
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.