$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
The D.C. Circuit reissued its opinion in Perry v. Mnuchin today. Copies of the reissued opinion (Doc. 1684473) and an order explaining the changes (Doc. 1684471) are attached to this e-mail message.
The sentence on page 68 of the Feb. 21 opinion citing Nemec for the proposition that, "What is arbitrary or unreasonable depends upon 'the parties' reasonable expectations at the time of contracting,'" has been deleted from the reissued opinion, and the D.C. Circuit tells Judge Lamberth at page 69 of the reissued opinion that he may need to hear more from the parties about GSE shareholders' reasonable expectations as he revisits GSE shareholder' claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing regarding liquidation preferences and the claim for breach of the implied covenant with respect to dividend rights.14-5243-1684471 14-5243-1684473
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.