$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
The Class Plaintiffs want the three-judge panel in D.C. to modify its ruling in Perry v. Mnuchin to make it clear that "[t]he relevant expectations for the breach of implied covenant claims are the expectations of the shareholders who purchased preferred or common shares in the Enterprises when those shares were issued, not the subsequent expectations of shareholders who purchased shares in the secondary market." A copy of the Class Plaintiffs' rehearing petition is attached to this e-mail message.
That fallacious attempt to discriminate among GSE shareholders based on the dates they purchased their shares is also buried in our government's supplemental motion to dismiss posted at http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Fairholme/13-465-0161.pdf delivered to Judge Sweeney on June 8, 2015. Briefing on that narrow topic was stayed in accordance with Judge Sweeney's order posted at http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Fairholme/13-465-0240.pdf entered on Sept. 9, 2015.14-5243-1668958
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.