$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
15-1177-166653 from earlier: Dow Jones reported a few minutes earlier that the Department of Justice says the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutionally structured. Indeed, in an amicus filing in PHH v. CFBP, No. 15-1177 (D.C. Cir.), today -- a copy of which is attached to this e-mail message -- the Department of Justice doesn't support the way the CFBP is structured. By implication, the Department of Justice would not support the way FHFA is structured. Our government's arguments today in PHH v. CFPB do not square with our government's arguments on a Reply filed on Feb. 27, 2017 -- see http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Collins/16-cv-03113-0038.pdf -- in Collins v. FHFA which challenges the constitutionality of the FHFA. Incredibly, Chad R. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, is the same lead lawyer in both cases!
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.