$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
Here's my shortest version of today's Opinion (Chapman, Peter):
"[C]ontract-based claims regarding liquidation preferences and dividend rights," the three-judge panel directs, "are remanded to the district court for further proceedings." Opinion at 5. The D.C. Circuit sees "no need to remand the claims for the district court to consider a fuller administrative record." Id. at 33, n. 12. The class plaintiffs secured the D.C. Circuit's permission to ask Judge Lamberth for his permission to "amend the[ir] complaint to add" new "direct fiduciary breach claims regarding the Fannie Mae Third Amendment.” Id. at 61. The D.C. Circuit instructs Judge Lamberth to "evaluate . . . under the correct legal standard . . . whether the Third Amendment violated the reasonable expectations of the parties at the various times the class plaintiffs purchased their shares." Id. at 68.
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.