$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
In an Amicus Brief filed this week, the Cato Institute and Southeastern Legal Foundation tell the Federal Circuit that the decision in Piszel v. U.S. represents an unwarranted expansion of the government's power to interfere with private contracts, and encourage the court to reconsider its decision. A copy of the Amicus Brief is attached to this e-mail message as well as Appearances entered by Andrew Buttaro, Esq., and W. Scott Hastings, Esq., at Locke Lord LLP, and David G. Cabrales, Esq., and Lucas C. Wohlford, Esq., at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, representing Cato and SLF. 15-5100-0072 15-5100-0073 15-5100-0074 15-5100-0075 15-5100-0071
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.