$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
The Edwards Plaintiffs are asking Judge Socla for permission to file a two-page sur-reply to FHFA's Reply in support of its substitution request to address the recent decision in Pagliara v. Freddie Mac. The Edwards Plaintiffs tell Judge Scola that FHFA does not object to this request and Deloitte takes no position on it. A copy of the Edward Plaintiffs' request, filed this morning, is attached to this e-mail message.16-cv-21221-0036
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.