$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
14-5243-1618442 FHFA delivered its opposition to the D.C. Circuit yesterday to Perry and Fairholme's request to take judicial notice of various documents Judge Sweeney unsealed last month. FHFA wags its finger and says Perry and Fairholme's supplemental document submission is both procedurally and substantively improper. "There is . . . no need . . . to attempt to substantiate . . . fact[s], or supplement the record," FHFA tells the D.C. Circuit. Perhaps that's not a 100% fair characterization of what FHFA actually says. In all events, FHFA urges the D.C. Circuit to ignore the additional documents Perry and Fairholme have provided.
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.