Fannie/Freddie Consolidated Class Action
FHFA, Fannie and Freddie want Judge Lamberth to instruct the jury the PSPAs required payment of a 10% cash dividend, the 12% rate was a penalty provision and the GSEs had no right to elect paying an in kind dividend prior to the Third Amendment, and a copy of that request is attached to this e-mail message.
Shareholders want Judge Lamberth to overrule objections FHFA, Fannie and Freddie made to Dr. Mason's testimony and give the jury an instruction that will restore the balance of a deal the parties made concerning Dr. Mason's expert testimony
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
◆Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.
