Get ready to be confused.
The Government filed a Reply (Doc. 291) today, under seal, in Fairholme v. U.S. The docket entry says it’s a Reply to a Response (Doc. 286) filed under seal by Fairholme to the Government’s mysterious Motion (Doc. 285) for expedited relief for something it wanted that was filed under seal. We thought that Judge Sweeney’s Order (Doc. 287) dated Jan. 26, 2016, also filed under seal, brought an end to whatever dispute was articulated in Docs. 285 and 286.
Apparently not. There’s something swirling in the ether related to Doc. 285 that’s still under wraps and wasn’t completely resolved when the parties filed their Joint Status Report (Doc. 288) on Jan, 28, 2016